Zero #2

I hit zero again yesterday. It took me nearly 8 hours! Admittedly, that’s because I had email two weeks old that was “urgent” (well, after 2 weeks!) that I needed to “Do” and not “Delegate”. I also had a bunch of stuff on post-it notes around my desk to drain into my trusted system. (I’d resorted to keeping the post-it notes stuck to the wrist-rests on my laptop, following the principle of “put it in front of the door“.)

The other thing that I tried to do, however, which significantly extended my time, was to attempt to improve my overall system by setting up MindReader. Unfortunately, I hit several snags that I just couldn’t push through. So I now have a partially working installation/configuration of MindReader, and a loss of two hours (or was it three!?).

I have two main motivations for trying set up MindReader again (my second attempt–I tried before about 10 months ago, I think).

First, I collect a lot of actions with GyroQ. So when it comes time to review, my In-Tray will be full of partially defined items that I captured in haste with GyroQ. One step in my weekly review process is to finish defining them, which means adding due dates, assigning additional owners, delegates, or partners, maybe adding a context. Because opening the ResultsManager edit activity dialogue is relatively inconvenient, and adds time to the overall process, I’m thinking that if I could define some of that additional task information at the moment of capture with GyroQ, that puts me ahead when it comes time for review–because I won’t have to do it again.
Second, when things around the office get really crazy (as it has seemed to be the case often lately), it may be a full two weeks between moments that I “hit zero”. In that interim time, my In-Tray can grow rather large (maybe 50 items?). Which means that, in there, somewhere, might be an activity that I would like to know I’m assigning to, say Bob, one of my direct reports. But until I take time to edit the activity and add Bob’s name to the Resources line, it won’t show up under Bob’s name on any dashboards I generate. Again, however, if I could add Bob’s name to the activity at the point of capture with GyroQ, then even if the activity isn’t fully defined and still sitting in my In-Tray, at least it shows up on the dashboard when I meet one-on-one with Bob and go over his activities. What I’ve been doing to work around this is OK, but inefficient. I look at Bob’s dashboard, and then I scan my gigantic In-Tray to make sure there isn’t anything else in there for Bob. Then in Joe’s one-on-one, right after Bob’s, I scan the In-Tray again to make sure there’s nothing in there for Joe. Then in Bill’s one-on-one…you get the point. So that’s inefficient, which is why I’m looking for a solution like MindReader.
So, I hit zero, despite the disappointing snag with MindReader. I can live with that.

5 Responses to “Zero #2”

  1. Don Says:

    I cannot get to zero. I’m being hit by too many deadlines that I can’t actually avoid and in the mean time the inbox is piling up. What I really need to do is turn off the spigots until I can catch up. But I can’t find them to turn off.

  2. Mike Wilkerson Says:

    The only way I could do it is that I have the freedom with my schedule that I can block out a day a week that I alternate between “day retreat”–where I go away to read, pray, journal, reflect, plan–and “full review”. Because it’s blocked out in advance, it doesn’t get cluttered with meetings. This week was my full review. Without that, I don’t think I would be able to hit zero, because the day before was insanity, and the day after was insanity (and still is for a few more hours). So that blocked out day is like a little oasis to give me a reprieve while I lock and load to jump back into the fray, sometimes spiritually, sometimes tactically. I was extremely tempted last week to punt on the day retreat because of “crisis mode”, but I’m still running two weeks later off the fuel I got that day–glad I kept it. Read the book of Numbers.

  3. ActivityOwner Says:

    Thanks for reporting and figuring out the MindReader “q” incompatibility with GyroQ 1.9.4.7. A revised version has been uploaded to the wiki and AO-Pack:

    http://wiki.activityowner.com/index.php?title=Mindreader-q-packed

    Getting to “Zero” is a big challenge. I find I can do it almost daily with home email and often weekly with work email. On the other hand, I get to the bottom of my home “paper” inbox much less frequently than I’d like.

    With email I can “archive” and be confident I can get the reference info back quickly with X1 or gmail search.

    For paper I think the problem is that my “reference” file draws are nearly full , so (as David Allen predicts) I tend to avoid MindReading the action and filing the paper away until needed.

  4. Mike Wilkerson Says:

    I have pretty much the same profile with my various inboxes. My paper inbox at home is the worst culprit. In the office, my paper file isn’t even alphabetized! Paper is just not a first class citizen in my life :-)

    An annoying problem I’ve been having lately regarding email archiving and Google Desktop Search, unfortunately, is that once a mail is archived, GDS won’t pull up the old mail item. I had that problem before, apparently because I’d accidently turned on encryption on the archive files. I thought it resolved when I turned off the encryption; but now I have the same problem.

    Thanks for your collaboration on the ‘q’ problem with MindReader. I’ve actually been re-inspired to put a bit more effort into wading deeper into MindReader as a results with hopes of improved productivity.

  5. Node Glue Says:

    Zero #3…

    Whew!  Hit zero again.  This great feeling will probably last about ten more seconds…tick…tick…
    This time, I did make better use of MindReader, but it still isn’t humming for me.  I’m having trouble with a couple of the…

Leave a Reply